5 days
<4 hrs
To a full incident assessment
Solutions
Your SBOMs already exist. So why does every question still take days to answer?
A CVE drops. An auditor asks for evidence. A customer wants your component list. Four different teams start four different manual searches and none of them agree.
Exodos connects all of it to one system of record, so the answer is the same no matter who asks.
What breaks today
Four teams. Four versions of the truth.
Compliance asks for updated SBOMs. Again.
You generate them manually, send them off, and three days later they’re rejected for “quality issues” you don’t understand. Your velocity suffers. Your team resents compliance. And the cycle repeats next quarter.
- Release blockers
- Compliance theater
- Tool fatigue
Today
3 days
With Exodos
<5 minutes
SBOM generated in CI
00:41
Quality + license checks
02:18
Feedback in pull request
04:52
<5 minutes from commit to validation feedback.
The alert hits. Nobody can say what’s affected.
Your CEO wants answers within the hour. Your customers are already emailing. But your team is manually searching repositories, pinging developers, and trying to reconstruct what components are actually in production.
- Blind spots everywhere
- Too slow to respond
- No risk quantification
Today
5 days
With Exodos
<4 hours
Affected components identified
16:12
Impact assessment complete
19:40
Board-ready summary
20:05
<4 hours to full incident assessment, versus five days of manual reconstruction.
The evidence exists. It just isn’t anywhere you can point to.
You’re accountable for proving compliance, but evidence lives in scattered tools and outdated spreadsheets. Manual SBOM collection drains weeks before every audit. Engineering resents constant interruptions. And regulators demand transparency you can’t consistently deliver.
- Manual evidence collection
- Always behind requirements
- No single source of truth
Today
6 weeks
With Exodos
1 click
NTIA minimum elements
Validated
EU CRA evidence pack
Ready
Immutable audit trail
Complete
1 click to a complete, audit-ready evidence pack.
Legal finds GPL code in a customer-facing product.
Engineering says “we didn’t know it was there.” Marketing has already announced the launch date. And you’re stuck mediating between release velocity and compliance risk.
- Hidden copyleft risk
- Manual license review
- Incomplete attribution
Today
3 weeks
With Exodos
<4 hours
Copyleft conflicts detected
+2 min
Policy exception filed
+1 hr
Attribution file generated
+3 hr
3 weeks to under 4 hours for a full license review.
Inside the platform
One system of record, working continuously
The same event answers four questions at once
When that CVE correlates, Security sees the blast radius, Engineering sees which builds to patch, Compliance gets the incident record, and Legal sees whether the fix changes a license obligation.
Nobody re-runs the search. Nobody disagrees about the number.
Book a Demo
Platform activity
Live
SBOM ingested from CI pipeline
just now
Policy check passed — NTIA minimum elements validated
12s
New CVE correlated — matched to impacted applications
1m
License conflict flagged — copyleft dependency in release candidate
4m
Supplier SBOM received — validated on arrival
6m
Evidence pack exported — EU CRA
17m
3 days
<5 min
From commit to validation feedback
6 weeks
1 click
To an audit-ready evidence pack
3 weeks
<4 hrs
For a complete license review
Free Trial
Start Your 14-Day Free Trial Today
Join security and engineering teams who have transformed their SBOM management from a compliance burden into a strategic advantage.